This reminds me cheerfully of the irrational exuberance scolding you so grandfatherly handed down while the stock market was inflating in the fall of 1996. Yea, the irrational exuberance you created with interest rates near ZERO.
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said the U.S. may be doing too little to repair its financial system and promote an economic recovery.
That would be the financial system you kamakazied, Al!
President Barack Obama yesterday signed into law a $787 billion economic stimulus package of tax cuts and increased spending. He has also pledged to use the bulk of the roughly $315 billion left in the bank bailout fund approved by Congress last October to revive the battered financial industry.
“The amount of money in both these pots may not be enough to solve the problem,” Greenspan said in an interview before a speech yesterday to the Economic Club of New York.
So just print more, you know all about it don't cha Al!
The comments highlight the difficulties Obama faces in fighting the steepest recession in a generation. The economy contracted at an annual pace of 3.8 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, the most since 1982.
In the speech, the former Fed chairman said “what we are currently going through is a once-in-a-century type of event. It will pass.”
Al wants you think it's a rare event that has a low probablity of occuring again. Actually it's an enginnered event that will occur with probability one every time you blow and pop bubbles in a ponzi financial economic scheme.
Greenspan, who now heads his own Washington-based consulting company, warned in his speech that the positive impact of the stimulus package on the economy will peter out if the U.S. fails to fix its financial system.
“Given the Japanese experience of the 1990s, we need to assure that the repair of the financial system precedes the onset of any major fiscal stimulus,” he said.
Make that Washington-based influence peddling company.
U.S. bank stocks have been hammered as their loan losses have mounted. Citigroup Inc., the bank that received $45 billion from the government last year, fell 43 cents to $3.06. JPMorgan Chase & Co., the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, declined $3.04 to $21.65. Bank of America Corp. dropped 67 cents to $4.90.
The Obama administration last week laid out a multipronged plan to aid the banks, drawing on the remaining money in the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Greenspan said that wouldn’t be enough.
“To stabilize the banking system and restore normal lending, additional TARP funds will be required,” he said.
Told You So! Told ya that when Paulson roled out the TARP, Al!
He highlighted the importance of building up banks’ capital. “Banks are not going to increase their lending until they feel comfortable with the amount of capital they hold,” he said in the Feb. 16 interview. “That’s not going to happen for a while.”
The 82-year-old economist also stressed the importance of halting the decline in house prices that is battering banks. “Until we can stabilize the asset side of bank balance sheets, this crisis will not come to a close,” he said.
The 82-year-old economist is senial! House prices must come down, before "we can stabilize the asset side of bank balance sheets, this crisis will not come to a close,”.
The prices will come down, most likely in a crash. Irrational exuberance Al.
U.S. banks have sustained $758 billion in credit losses since the crisis began. Many of those losses stemmed from mortgage-related investments that declined with the collapse in the housing market.
Home prices in 20 U.S. cities fell 18.2 percent in November from a year earlier, the fastest drop on record, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index.
“Unfortunately, the prospect of stable home prices remains many months in the future,” Greenspan said in his speech. “Many forecasters project a decline in home prices of 10 percent or more from current levels.”
Not many forecasters project a decline in home prices of 10 percent Al, it's more like the or more, that most forecasters project, on my planet , Al.
“Certainly, by any historical measure, world stock prices are cheap,” Greenspan said. “But as history also counsels they could get a lot cheaper before they turn.”
Cheap?? Tim Iacono says this best,
I wonder if he gets strange looks from other economists.He said that investors were gripped by a degree of fear not seen since at least 1932. Those fears should dissipate once the rate of decline in the economy and the financial markets starts to slow, he added.
Yup, the FED had it's hands all over that one too.
“A rise in equity prices could help offset the impact of falling house prices” on the economy, he said in the interview.
Still blowing bubbles Al?“A rise in equity prices could help offset the impact of falling house prices” on the economy, he said in the interview.
Pucker Up Al.
Yet he warned that a stock market recovery could be derailed if inflation fears resurface because of the money the government is channeling into the economy.
The threat is Deflation dum dum. Again I wonder if he gets strange looks from other economists.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note ended yesterday at 2.65 percent, down from 2.88 percent a day earlier, yet still well above the 2.05 percent level set on Dec. 30.
Responding to questions after the speech, Greenspan blamed insufficient regulatory oversight in part for failing to recognize the degree of risk that was accumulating in the banking system.
The champion of lazaire faire capitalism learns the sword cuts both ways.
‘Behind the Curve’
“The regulatory structures, especially internationally, were way behind the curve,” he said.
Greenspan said he was skeptical that officials can adopt a policy that prevents asset bubbles from forming without harming other parts of the economy.
I'm not, get rid of the FED and it's printing press and you instantly end the bubble factory.
To help resolve the banking system’s problems, financial institutions may need higher capital reserves to help restore them to health, he said.
We need an end to the fractional reserve banking system, Al.
“There is a general belief that somehow we can regulate very complex organizations, and we can’t,” he said. “What we’ve got to do is to try to make them more efficient, to put far more capital into these organizations.”
Yea well Al why
..., can't Al--the ex-J.P. Morgan economist Ayn Rand dubbed The Undertaker--shut up? Can't he retire on his ill-gotten gains? Of course, he shows the value of a sell-out "libertarian" to the state. Even Al, "the high priest of laissez-faire," is for national socialism, so why aren't you?But al just can't quite. At at age 82 old habits die hard so Al just goes on ling though his fales teeth and blowing bubbles.
No comments:
Post a Comment